Artificial intelligence influences human choices. Final responsibility for decisions remains with humans. This walkthrough explains how clause 2.1.3 applies in practice. Understanding free will supports trust and safety. Roles for people, teams, and institutions become clear. Users see the boundaries حُدُود (boundaries). Organizations build processes that can be audited. Link to clause 2.1.2 about القَدَرُ […]
This clause connects belief in القَدَرُ (al‑qadar, predestination) with personal responsibility. It guards against ٱلْجَبْرِيَّةُ (al‑jabriyya, fatalism) and the excuse that “the machine decided so”. Below is how to apply the norm without losing تَقْوَى (taqwā, God‑consciousness) or common sense. Code Text 2.1.2. Predestination without fatalismDivine predestination is acknowledged, yet human responsibility for choice and
The Code reminds us that the foundation is التَّوْحِيدُ (tawḥīd, monotheism). Technology cannot become an object of veneration. AI is only a tool with clear حُدُودٌ (boundaries). 1) Wording and Scope of Application Item §2.1.1. “Monotheism and a warning against techno-deification.” AI development and operation must rest on strict adherence to the principle of monotheism.
The Code ensures that AI serves society without crossing the bounds of الشَّرِيعَةُ (Sharia). It clarifies human roles and حُدُودٌ (boundaries) across the entire lifecycle of AI systems. Below is how to understand and apply Section 1 “General Provisions” in practice. 1) What exactly we analyze and where it applies Formulation of the norm (items
